Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a solution to climate change. The idea is to reflect sunlight back into space. The most prominent technique involves injecting aerosols into the stratosphere to increase the reflection of sunlight, thereby reducing the accelerated greenhouse effect responsible for global warming. However, this technology is associated with high risks due to the uncertainty of the expected effects. These include a significant reduction in the intensity of the hydrological cycle. In addition, reliance on solar geoengineering could delay climate change mitigation efforts.
Solar geoengineering
Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a solution to climate change. The idea is to reflect sunlight back into space. The most prominent technique involves injecting aerosols into the stratosphere to increase the reflection of sunlight, thereby reducing the accelerated greenhouse effect responsible for global warming. However, this technology is associated with high risks due to the uncertainty of the expected effects. These include a significant reduction in the intensity of the hydrological cycle. In addition, reliance on solar geoengineering could delay climate change mitigation efforts.
Nº 75
- Climate & Atmosphere
- Changing the Climate System
- Promotion of Geoengineering
some attempts made
past case
Region-1
Region-2
Region-3
Region-4
ongoing case
no attempts made
Solar geoengineering
Solar geoengineering represents a global case of environmental problem shifting, as the implementation of the technology would have effects worldwide. The nature and distribution of these effects are highly uncertain because of the complexity of the Earth system to which it would be applied. In addition, the use of this technology is difficult to regulate in an equitable and effective way under current global political configurations. This would raise important questions about the decision-making process, the location, intensity and timing of implementation, and the responsibility for unforeseen adverse consequences. It is clear that the risks posed by the technology would be unevenly distributed, raising questions about the legitimacy of the decision-making process.
Sulfate injection into the stratosphere, a popular option in solar geoengineering debates, has been shown to have the potential to significantly damage the ozone layer near the poles, posing a threat to life on Earth.
Biermann, F., Oomen, J., Gupta, A., Ali, S. H., Conca, K., Hajer, M. A., Kashwan, P., Kotzé, L. J., Leach, M., Messner, D., Okereke, C., Persson, Å., Potočnik, J., Schlosberg, D., Scobie, M., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2022). Solar geoengineering: The case for an international non-use agreement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.754
Jülich Forschungszentrum. Hazards of Geoengineering. (n.d.). Available at: https://www.fz-juelich.de/en/iek/iek-7/research/upper-troposphere-and-stratosphere/hazards-of-geoengineering.
Stephens, J. C., Kashwan, P., McLaren, D., & Surprise, K. (2021). The risks of solar geoengineering research. Science, 372(6547), 1161-1161.
Irvine, P. J., Kravitz, B., Lawrence, M. G., & Muri, H. (2016). An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(6), 815-833.
Questions/comments